ZOGling Whigger Ass-Clown of the Day

Jean Griffin on the jewplin Glob -- Dec. 28, 2008

The politics of race in Missouri

Jean W. Griffith

The community of Joplin and Jasper County as a whole should applaud The Joplin Globe’s decision to endorse Barack Obama for president.

Contrary to naysayers, the Globe has not “lost its way.” Rather, the newspaper has exhibited new-found courage in this bold decision to break with its centenary “business as usual” endorsement of a Republican for president.

That, however, is not my purpose for addressing the Globe’s readership today. I want to explain the reason Missouri lost its bellwether status in picking a president in this election cycle. After endorsing William Jennings Bryan in 1900, only once in the 20th century did Missouri fail to vote for the winner of the presidency. That occurred in 1956 when Missourians voted for Adlai Stevenson over Dwight D. Eisenhower. What happened during the 2008 election cycle?

If you listen carefully to Missouri voters and read their editorials in the Globe and in other newspapers around the state, the explanations as to why voters rejected Obama by a narrow margin in the Show-Me state range from the laughable to the ludicrous. Such justifications include: Obama is just another corrupt Chicago politician like Rod Blagojevich; Obama is too liberal; Obama is a socialist; Obama is a Muslim; and Obama isn’t even an American are most of the most popular reasons the first black person to receive his political party’s nomination for president and win was rejected by Missouri’s voters at the polls.

Looking carefully at a county-by-county breakdown of the vote, you discover a probable cause for the state losing its bellwether status. Many Missouri voters made their decision to reject Obama based not on the “content of his character,” but rather on “the color of his skin.” Clearly, there is substantive evidence in the numbers pointing to race as a pivotal factor in Barack Obama losing Missouri by a razor-thin margin in the total votes cast, signaling the end of “the bellwether streak.”

The end of the “streak” appears to be a political oddity until you consider the fact Obama and Jay Nixon exchanged endorsements early on in the primary campaign. Given their mutual support for one another, only Buchanan, Boone, Jefferson, St. Genevieve, Washington, Iron and urban Jackson and St. Louis counties went solidly for Obama and Democratic gubernatorial Jay Nixon alike by a substantial margin of the popular vote.

Strange as it might seem, the rest of predominately rural Missouri endorsed McCain-Palin in addition to Democrat Jay Nixon, meaning a large percentage of the Missouri electorate split their tickets voting for the Republican ticket for president and the Democrat Nixon for governor.

Ticket splitting in and of itself is not unusual until you carefully analyze the state in its entirety on a county-by-county basis. For example, every county south of the Interstate 44 corridor, except the western half of the 7th Congressional District, went for McCain-Palin as well as Jay Nixon by similar margins. Across the political landscape in Missouri, Democrats and Republicans obviously split their tickets on a massive scale.

Across Missouri’s farm country and in most Southwest Missouri communities, with the exception of a thriving Hispanic minority, the state remains frozen in time both politically, socially and culturally.

To their credit, school districts across the state admit and teach minority students in accordance with federal law, though local education and county courthouses are controlled by dominant “white,” authoritarian majorities. Surprisingly, south of the I-44 corridor, only Springfield R-12 has made a conscientious effort to recruit minority teachers and staff to reflect contemporary, multi-racial American society.

As one might expect, Republican voters in the western half of Southwest Missouri are going to argue race had nothing to do with their decision to vote solidly for McCain-Palin and political lightweight Kenny Hulshof for governor. They will contend they were consistent and based their decision to reject Obama based on his liberalism. Nothing could be further from the truth.

You should know not once, but three times, Missouri Republicans throughout Missouri rejected Reagan Republican Alan Keyes, a conservative Evangelical, pro-life black for their party’s nomination for president of the United States. In his run for the U.S. Senate in Missouri, black Kansas City moderate Congressman Alan Wheat, a Democrat, didn’t stand a chance in 1994 against John Ashcroft. And at last report, if Missouri Republicans have their way, Michael Steele, a staunch conservative who coined the phrase, “drill, baby, drill!” during his convention speech in Minneapolis will never be elected chair of the Republican National Committee.

To determine what Missouri’s Democrats and Republicans are ideologically saying is a difficult task. Ticket-splitting Democrats are closer to being Strom Thurmond Dixiecrats, Jeffersonian Democrats, or George Wallace Democrats than they are to being Truman Democrats. Republicans are even more puzzling. By pandering to the whims of big business and the religious right, their total disregard for civil liberties and the environment, and their disturbing belief in racial purity, Republicans are similar in ideology to Libertarians, Wal-Mart Republicans, Herbert Hoover Republicans, John Birchers, or, in a few isolated cases, National Socialists. Call them anything you like, but do not call them Lincoln Republicans.

Is that to say these Missouri voter are bad people? They are not! It is to say, however, that good people often make crucial political decisions based on blind party allegiance, misinformation, demagoguery and their deep-seated prejudices and fears.

Jean W. Griffith lives in Carthage.

.

.

Notes & Commentary

Ass Kick of the Day 4 The ZOGling Whigger Ass-Clown of the Day

The politics of race in Missouri

Quote: Originally Posted by stupid whigger bitch: in italics

The community of Joplin and Jasper County as a whole should applaud The Joplin Globe’s decision to endorse Barack Obama for president.

Contrary to naysayers, the Globe has not “lost its way.” Rather, the newspaper has exhibited new-found courage in this bold decision to break with its centenary “business as usual” endorsement of a Republican for president.

No the jewplin Glob saw that the nigger was gonna win anyway, so decided to show how 'progressive' and gliberal whigger it could be in serving its jew masters. jews own the jewplin Glob. They are firing the whigger jewnalist presstitutes right and left, and in the Sunday jewspaper they whine that normal whiggers don't like to read this stupid shit, or at least pay for it, and so the jewplin Glob has to lay off a bunch of them stupid gliberal whiggers and is losing money and soon no more jewplinGlob is we are lucky, the dumb fucks.

That, however, is not my purpose for addressing the Globe’s readership today. I want to explain the reason Missouri lost its bellwether status in picking a president in this election cycle. After endorsing William Jennings Bryan in 1900, only once in the 20th century did Missouri fail to vote for the winner of the presidency. That occurred in 1956 when Missourians voted for Adlai Stevenson over Dwight D. Eisenhower. What happened during the 2008 election cycle?

The stupid whiggers didn't want to vote for a nigger and so they thought that it was more important to say no, than to vote yes and preserve 'bellwether' status when it does nothing for them, you stupid sanctimonious whigger cunt. jewr purpose is to establish what a stupid gliberal nigger-loving coal-hauling whigger bitch you are.

If you listen carefully to Missouri voters and read their editorials in the Globe and in other newspapers around the state, the explanations as to why voters rejected Obama by a narrow margin in the Show-Me state range from the laughable to the ludicrous. Such justifications include: Obama is just another corrupt Chicago politician like Rod Blagojevich; Obama is too liberal; Obama is a socialist; Obama is a Muslim; and Obama isn’t even an American are most of the most popular reasons the first black person to receive his political party’s nomination for president and win was rejected by Missouri’s voters at the polls.

Looking carefully at a county-by-county breakdown of the vote, you discover a probable cause for the state losing its bellwether status. Many Missouri voters made their decision to reject Obama based not on the “content of his character,” but rather on “the color of his skin.” Clearly, there is substantive evidence in the numbers pointing to race as a pivotal factor in Barack Obama losing Missouri by a razor-thin margin in the total votes cast, signaling the end of “the bellwether streak.”

Nobody white wanted to vote for the nigger. They didn't want to admit that they didn't vote for the nigger because they don't like niggers. A nigger's hide is a dead giveaway as to the 'coontent' of its character, as it indicates an animal which will practice TnB -- Typical nigger Behavior. Admitting one is leery, based upon experience with niggers would mean that the jewsmedia would bitch, like this stupid cunt does, about 'racism.' Nor could they live with themselves if they voted for a thieving commie coon.

The end of the “streak” appears to be a political oddity until you consider the fact Obama and Jay Nixon exchanged endorsements early on in the primary campaign. Given their mutual support for one another, only Buchanan, Boone, Jefferson, St. Genevieve, Washington, Iron and urban Jackson and St. Louis counties went solidly for Obama and Democratic gubernatorial Jay Nixon alike by a substantial margin of the popular vote.

Strange as it might seem, the rest of predominately rural Missouri endorsed McCain-Palin in addition to Democrat Jay Nixon, meaning a large percentage of the Missouri electorate split their tickets voting for the Republican ticket for president and the Democrat Nixon for governor.

Ticket splitting in and of itself is not unusual until you carefully analyze the state in its entirety on a county-by-county basis. For example, every county south of the Interstate 44 corridor, except the western half of the 7th Congressional District, went for McCain-Palin as well as Jay Nixon by similar margins. Across the political landscape in Missouri, Democrats and Republicans obviously split their tickets on a massive scale.

Jay Nixon was going to beat the idiotic thieving moron Runt Blunt until RuntBlunt was told to leave. So that left a thieving gliberal whigger Republican named Hulsdof, who fought a primary against the real Republican populist Sarah Steelman. So Jay Nixon picked up what he was going to win against some discredited Repulsivescammer anyway.

Across Missouri’s farm country and in most Southwest Missouri communities, with the exception of a thriving Hispanic minority, the state remains frozen in time both politically, socially and culturally.

This stupid bitch isn't going to be happy until drowned in Mexcrement. The stupid bitch could move to Monett/Mexinett if she wants to drown in beaners.

To their credit, school districts across the state admit and teach minority students in accordance with federal law, though local education and county courthouses are controlled by dominant “white,” authoritarian majorities. Surprisingly, south of the I-44 corridor, only Springfield R-12 has made a conscientious effort to recruit minority teachers and staff to reflect contemporary, multi-racial American society.

Yes, there is a section in Springfield in which the niggers and beaners and poor whiggers live cheek-to-jowl so they have plenty of their own to hire. Again, this stupid whigger cunt doesn't want to live next to what she professes to love.

As one might expect, Republican voters in the western half of Southwest Missouri are going to argue race had nothing to do with their decision to vote solidly for McCain-Palin and political lightweight Kenny Hulshof for governor. They will contend they were consistent and based their decision to reject Obama based on his liberalism. Nothing could be further from the truth.

So? They didn't want to vote for a nigger and they didn't want to hear a stupid whigger bitch getting in their face over this shit. So they can put up with not reading about it in a jewspaper that normal whiggers don't read any more -- the jewplin Glob.

You should know not once, but three times, Missouri Republicans throughout Missouri rejected Reagan Republican Alan Keyes, a conservative Evangelical, pro-life black for their party’s nomination for president of the United States. In his run for the U.S. Senate in Missouri, black Kansas City moderate Congressman Alan Wheat, a Democrat, didn’t stand a chance in 1994 against John Ashcroft. And at last report, if Missouri Republicans have their way, Michael Steele, a staunch conservative who coined the phrase, “drill, baby, drill!” during his convention speech in Minneapolis will never be elected chair of the Republican National Committee.

Alan Keyes is a thieving professional token nigger. Who needs a token nigger? What good are niggers if you don't need a tom nigger?

To determine what Missouri’s Democrats and Republicans are ideologically saying is a difficult task. Ticket-splitting Democrats are closer to being Strom Thurmond Dixiecrats, Jeffersonian Democrats, or George Wallace Democrats than they are to being Truman Democrats. Republicans are even more puzzling. By pandering to the whims of big business and the religious right, their total disregard for civil liberties and the environment, and their disturbing belief in racial purity, Republicans are similar in ideology to Libertarians, Wal-Mart Republicans, Herbert Hoover Republicans, John Birchers, or, in a few isolated cases, National Socialists. Call them anything you like, but do not call them Lincoln Republicans.

Well, don't call them National Socialists. I'm a National Socialist. They are simply thieving Republican whiggers, all for socialism if it involves corporate welfare and for LibberToonitarianism if it involves paying taxes. Democrats who voted for McCain are anti-nigger Democrats, and have more sense than typical Republican whiggers.

Is that to say these Missouri voter are bad people? They are not! It is to say, however, that good people often make crucial political decisions based on blind party allegiance, misinformation, demagoguery and their deep-seated prejudices and fears.

Jean W. Griffith lives in Carthage.

The stupid lying whigger bitch certainly is not going to live next to all them niggers she professes to love but actually fears.

===============

Like most whiggers, this stupid bitch wants to have it both ways. She wants to get down on the other whiggers because they are more racist than she is. Yet she doesn't want to live where all them niggers that she professes to know live.

The whiggers of Missouri nearly voted the nigger in as it was. So what if Missery loses its 'bellweather' status. Who cares? That is not reason enough to vote for some nigger.

And if she loves niggers so much, why not move to Kansas City and live with all the niggers there? All the niggers in KC voted for their nigger, not one voted for McCain. So aren't the niggers racist too?

This whigger cunt lives for nothing more than yapping about how it is so much more morally superior to other whiggers because it voted for a nigger. Well, in my book, this stupid cunt is a race-traitor, and thus my choice for ZOGling Whigger Ass-Clown of the Day for December 28, 2008. Its prize should be skinning alive and giving the meat and pelt to feed these hungry niggers it professes to love so very much. These Marxian meat-whiggers are good for nothing else.


Pastor Martin Luther Dzerzhinski Lindstedt
Church of Jesus Christ Christian/Aryan Nations of Missouri

.

Over to ZOGling Whigger Ass-Clown of the Day
Over to How the Criminal Regime Destroyed my Family
Over to My Struggle -- The Rants of a Resistance Political Operative
Over to Thought for the Day
Over to Martin Lindstedt's CI Church & State WWW Page
Back to www.martinlindstedt.org or Patrick Henry On-Line